I'm not trying to be rude, but I only like the server's motion. It looks like you were trying to capture this, based on the length of the exposure, but the rest of the blur hurts my eyes.
I don't have room to critique your abilities (however few short-comings you have), but the photo itself and the fact that you like this accident is fair game. After all, that is one purpose of art...to spawn discussion amid disagreement.
I support your opinion, and I agree with it. But this was an accident. I wasn't trying to capture the servers motion, but it did because the exposure was longer than I expected. After it happened, however, I wished I had planned to do it because I would have known about the longer exposure and therefore would have known to hold the camera steadier than I did, thus capturing the movement of the server without causing stationary object blur. Had I the opportunity to take it again with this intention I would have, but this was more of a one time around thing. ;-)
2 Comments:
I'm not trying to be rude, but I only like the server's motion. It looks like you were trying to capture this, based on the length of the exposure, but the rest of the blur hurts my eyes.
I don't have room to critique your abilities (however few short-comings you have), but the photo itself and the fact that you like this accident is fair game. After all, that is one purpose of art...to spawn discussion amid disagreement.
I support your opinion, and I agree with it. But this was an accident. I wasn't trying to capture the servers motion, but it did because the exposure was longer than I expected. After it happened, however, I wished I had planned to do it because I would have known about the longer exposure and therefore would have known to hold the camera steadier than I did, thus capturing the movement of the server without causing stationary object blur. Had I the opportunity to take it again with this intention I would have, but this was more of a one time around thing.
;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home